Patent Case Law and Intellectual Property Practice Blog

Immediate appeal against a decision dismissing an application for an order to disclose sender information. A Taiwanese provider supplied services within Japan. ⇒ Japanese courts have jurisdiction!! (The first-instance court had held that jurisdiction could not be found. Reversed!

日本語版: https://www.takaishihideki.com/single-post/linkedin-7511585401640255488-ja Article information Content type: Lectures and videos Categories: United States / China / Europe Issues: Standard-essential patents / FRAND / Injunctions / International jurisdiction First published on this site: 2026-10-03 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-03 <IP Practice Online> “The forefront of standard-essential patents (SEPs): Practice in light of global litigation trends” (Akiko

Korean courts tend to interpret territoriality flexibly, assessing infringement primarily by whether acts of working the patent occur in Korea, regardless of the location of servers or assembly. 1. Servers located abroad (1) Seoul Central District Court, 2007, 2006 Gahap 73442

(Vincenzo Jandoli, AIPPI Vol. 71, No. 3) Where components sold in its own country by a company outside Europe (e.g., China) are later incorporated into finished products that infringe a patent in Europe (e.g., Italy), this may constitute "contributory infringement."

A review of 34 articles published in January 2026 by attorney Hideki Takaishi, covering divisional applications, invalidity arguments, claim interpretation, international jurisdiction, standard-essential patents and employee inventions.