Civil Law — Osaka District Court, 2021 (Wa) 11286 and 2022 (Wa) 9132: No Contractual Nonconformity
In response to the allegation of breach of the obligation to achieve the sales plan, termination and mistake were asserted, but neither was accepted. The contract did not specify the efficacy of the products, their mechanism of action in the body, the amount of hydrogen generated
[Unfair Competition Prevention Act / Contracts] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 5 (Wa) 886 <Judge Takemiya>
Japanese version: https://www.takaishihideki.com/single-post/linkedin-7513417095313977344-ja Article information Article type: Case note Categories: Unfair competition law Issues: Contract interpretation Published on website: 2026-10-08 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-08 [Unfair Competition Prevention Act / Contracts] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 5 (Wa) 886 <Judge Takemiya> * The contractual warranty was held to cover only the goods sold, not finished products inco
[Trademarks / Contracts] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) 7393, “MICHEL JURDAIN” <Judge Takemiya>
Japanese version: https://www.takaishihideki.com/single-post/linkedin-7513416876903899136-ja Article information Article type: Case note Categories: Trademarks Issues: Trademark infringement, Contract interpretation Published on website: 2026-10-08 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-08 [Trademarks / Contracts] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) 7393, “MICHEL JURDAIN” <Judge Takemiya> * The injunction claim was partly granted!! * The bankruptcy trustee's understanding
