top of page

Civil Law — Osaka District Court, 2021 (Wa) 11286 and 2022 (Wa) 9132: No Contractual Nonconformity

3 日前
読了時間: 1分

更新日:2 日前


Article information

Article type: Case note

Categories: Other Japanese law

Topics: Contracts, Contract interpretation

First published on this website: 2026-10-16

Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17

Case information: 2021 (Wa) 11286 / 2022 (Wa) 9132


Civil Law — Osaka District Court, 2021 (Wa) 11286 and 2022 (Wa) 9132

In response to the allegation of breach of the obligation to achieve the sales plan, termination and mistake were asserted, but neither was accepted.

The contract did not specify the efficacy of the products, their mechanism of action in the body, the amount of hydrogen generated, or similar matters. These matters could not be found to have been specifically agreed upon as terms of the contract.

⇒ No contractual nonconformity.

Originally published: 2025-03-02



Update history

This history records actual publication, display, and classification changes made on this website.

2026-10-16: The AMEBLO source was first published on this website.

2026-10-17: Added classification, topic tags, article information, translation navigation, related articles, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original article text was not changed.

 
 
 
Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page