Duty of disclosure | 弁護士・高石秀樹の特許チャンネル

[IP Practice Online] Reviewing U.S. patent IDS practice: From "submit everything just in case" to "rule-based selection"

Shigeki Takeuchi, Partner, Kim and Stewart LLP; California attorney, U.S. patent agent, Japanese patent attorney (Summary translation; case discussions omitted) Replace indiscriminate IDS submissions with rule-based selection considering relevance, cumulativeness, timing, cost and future enforceability. This does not mean abolishing IDS submissions: the disclosure duty remains. Adopt reasonable criteria and record non-submission reasons.

Tokyo District Court, 2013 (Wa) 33070 [Agricultural-Produce Sorting Apparatus] <Hasegawa>

[Article] Supplementing Unfair-Competition Protection Through Civil Code Tort Law (Patent Supplement, 2023; Professor Tatsuhiro Ueno)

[Unfair Competition Prevention Act / Trade Secrets] Tokyo District Court, 2014 (Wa) 1397, the Shoe Last case

[U.S. Patents] November 6, 2023, CAFC <ACTELION v. MYLAN> — Interpretation of Numerical Limitations and Rounding

[Design / Estoppel] Intellectual Property High Court, 2021 (Gyo-Ke) 10067 <Honda>

[Article] The Relationship Between ‘Confusion’ and ‘Business Interests’ Under Article 2(1)(i) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Professor Hisayoshi Yokoyama)

[Article] Judicial Decisions on Infringement Warnings and Notification of False Facts Under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Patent Supplement, 2023; Professor Toshiya Kaneko)

Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]

Intellectual Property High Court, 2021 (Ne) 10088 and 2022 (Ne) 10014 [Information Communication Unit]

[Trademark / Contract] Osaka District Court, 1996 (Wa) 6700 — Abuse of the right to terminate

Patent Case Law and Intellectual Property Practice Blog