[IP Practice Online] Joint Reading Festival for “A Sham Selection of One Hundred Copyright Cases” (Subaru Tomori)
日本語原文 / Japanese original Article information Article type: Lectures and videos Category: Copyright, Unfair competition law Topics: Defamation First published on this website: 2026-11-01 Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026 Originally published on Ameblo: 2025-12-14 (Japan time). Full English translation. https://ameblo.jp/hideki-takaishi/entry-12950047923.html [IP Practice Online] Joint Reading Festival for “A Sham Selection of One Hundred Copyright Cases” (S
Copyright: Including tweets in a book held to be lawful quotation under Copyright Act Article 32(1) — #KuToo case (Takuto Hirasawa, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 66, 2022)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Quotation, Moral rights, Defamation First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 Case information: Tokyo District Court, 2020 (Wa) No. 19351 [Article / Copyright] Including tweets in a book held to be lawful quotation under Copyright Act Article 32(1) — #KuToo case (Takuto Hirasawa, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 66, 202
[Unfair Competition Prevention Act] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 5 (Wa) 70513, the “Karate dojo” case <Judge Nakashima>
Japanese version: https://www.takaishihideki.com/single-post/linkedin-7513416207610507264-ja Article information Article type: Case note Categories: Unfair competition law Issues: Defamation Published on website: 2026-10-08 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-08 [Unfair Competition Prevention Act] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 5 (Wa) 70513, the “Karate dojo” case <Judge Nakashima> Although the plaintiff's name was not stated, a person acquainted with the plaintiff, or a
[Copyright] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 5 (Wa) 70125 <Presiding Judge Takahashi>
Notifying YouTube of copyright infringement, invasion of privacy and defamation through its notification forms regarding uploaded videos was held not to constitute a tort interfering with expressive activity. 1. Google carefully reviews takedown requests, sometimes requesting additional information or rejecting requests. Videos are therefore not removed unconditionally.
[Right to reputation] Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2025 (Wa) 70451
(Presiding Judge Nakajima) *A right to demand deletion against note inc. was recognized. No. 1: A statement suggesting that the plaintiff paid money to appear on ABEMA Prime through a slot obtained by connections
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_225,h_125,fp_0.50_0.50,lg_1,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png)
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_152,h_84,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png)
