![[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.webp)
![[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.webp)
[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Copyrightability, Applied art First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 [Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024) These three cases all denied copyrightability of utilitarian articles bearing two-dimensional patterns: • Futo
![[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.webp)
![[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.webp)
[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Copyrightability, Applied art First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 [Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015) IP High Court, August 28, 2014 (appeal); Tokyo District Court, July 19, 2013 Both c
A Recent Court Decision on the Copyrightability of Applied Art
A 2015 case note on the copyrightability of applied art, discussing the decision in Heisei 26 (Ne) No. 10063 and its relationship to approaches in foreign jurisdictions.
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_225,h_125,fp_0.50_0.50,lg_1,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.webp)
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_21,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.webp)