![[Copyright] IP High Court, Case No. 2025 (Ne) 10063](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_46a84176861d41598705fea8c193c018~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_46a84176861d41598705fea8c193c018~mv2.webp)
![[Copyright] IP High Court, Case No. 2025 (Ne) 10063](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_46a84176861d41598705fea8c193c018~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_46a84176861d41598705fea8c193c018~mv2.webp)
[Copyright] IP High Court, Case No. 2025 (Ne) 10063
"Mark Gonzales / Angel" (Presiding Judge Moritomi) (= First instance: Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2023 (Wa) 70127, Presiding Judge Shibuya) <Applicable law>
[Copyrighted works] Osaka District Court, Case No. 2023 (Wa) 9267
"Yamashiron" (Presiding Judge Matsukawa) *Regarding the requirement of "specific reference" under Article 61(2) of the Copyright Act, the court held that a comprehensive statement or agreement is insufficient and that an express agreement specifically identifying the rights under Articles 27 and 28 of the Copyright Act as rights to be transferred is necessary.
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_225,h_125,fp_0.50_0.50,lg_1,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.webp)
![Tokyo District Court, 2012 (Wa) 12351 [Rice Cake]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_21,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_1e68d290faf1421383ef0182da9fd77b~mv2.webp)