top of page

[Design] IP High Court, Case No. 2024 (Gyo-ke) 10108

Sep 28
2 min read

Updated: Oct 14

Article information

Article type: Case note

Display and classification checked: 2026-09-30

Categories: Designs

Topics: Similarity of designs / Partial designs / Novelty

Published on this website: 2026-09-29

[Design] IP High Court, Case No. 2024 (Gyo-ke) 10108

[Packaging container / Partial design] (Presiding Judge Masuda)

★ A judgment clarifying whether a partial design and an overall design can be registered as related designs, and the difference in the scope of comparison in assessing novelty!!

<Comparison with the principal design: related design, Article 10(1)>

The design in the application is a partial design covering only the flange, whereas the principal design is an overall design covering the entire storage container. They therefore differ greatly in use, function, position, size, extent, shape, etc., and are not similar.

⇒ Cannot be registered as a related design.

<Comparison with the cited design: novelty, Article 3(1)(iii)>

Since registration as a related design is unavailable, Article 10(2) does not apply to the registered design at issue, and it is not excluded from the cited designs.

⇒ The portion in the application and the corresponding portion of the cited design share the characteristic form of the flange and are similar.

*The court held that, when comparing an overall design with a partial design, the scope of comparison differs between the similarity assessment for related designs (comparing the whole with the part) and that for novelty (comparing with the corresponding portion of the cited design), and there is nothing improper about the determinations differing.



Updates and corrections

This log starts on 30 September 2026. Display and classification checks are distinct from a review of the legal analysis.

2026-09-30 — Presentation update: added the article type, this change log and a link to consultation options. The existing article text was preserved.


2026-10-01 | Name notation: changed Hu Chunfeng and Lin Jun to the verified Roman-letter forms Chunfeng Hu and Jun Lin in the English text and navigation. Names verified against their 2015 coauthored Patent article and the JPAA English contents. No change to legal analysis.

Intellectual property enquiries

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page