top of page

[Article / Patents] Cross-border patent infringement in the IoT era (Takeshi Maeda, Patent, 2025 Supplement No. 31)

Sep 28
2 min read

Updated: Oct 15

Article information

Article type: Publication review

Display and classification checked: 2026-09-30

Categories: Patents

Topics: Extraterritorial application

Published on this website: 2026-09-29

[Article / Patents] Cross-border patent infringement in the IoT era (Takeshi Maeda, Patent, 2025 Supplement No. 31)

While retaining traditional territoriality (the principle that a patent’s effect is confined to the territory of that country), the article proposes “flexible application” to ensure the effectiveness of patent rights.

In determining whether an act of working was performed in Japan, it emphasizes not only the actor’s location but also the “place where the act’s result occurs.”

The “place of the result” is defined for each act of working; if it is in Japan, the Japanese patent’s effect extends to it.



Updates and corrections

This log starts on 30 September 2026. Display and classification checks are distinct from a review of the legal analysis.

2026-09-30 — Presentation update: added the article type, this change log and a link to consultation options. The existing article text was preserved.


2026-10-01 | Name notation: replaced verified Japanese-script personal names with Roman-letter forms in this English article and its navigation. Legal analysis and original publication date unchanged.

Intellectual property enquiries

Images from the original AMEBLO article

English translations of the original image text

English translation of original image text


Original images retained for comparison

Original image 1


Original AMEBLO article

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page