Civil Law — Osaka District Court, 2021 (Wa) 11286 and 2022 (Wa) 9132: No Contractual Nonconformity
Updated: 2 days ago
Article information
Article type: Case note
Categories: Other Japanese law
Topics: Contracts, Contract interpretation
First published on this website: 2026-10-16
Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17
Case information: 2021 (Wa) 11286 / 2022 (Wa) 9132
Civil Law — Osaka District Court, 2021 (Wa) 11286 and 2022 (Wa) 9132
In response to the allegation of breach of the obligation to achieve the sales plan, termination and mistake were asserted, but neither was accepted.
The contract did not specify the efficacy of the products, their mechanism of action in the body, the amount of hydrogen generated, or similar matters. These matters could not be found to have been specifically agreed upon as terms of the contract.
⇒ No contractual nonconformity.
Originally published: 2025-03-02
Original Japanese post: https://ameblo.jp/hideki-takaishi/entry-12888358739.html
Update history
This history records actual publication, display, and classification changes made on this website.
2026-10-16: The AMEBLO source was first published on this website.
2026-10-17: Added classification, topic tags, article information, translation navigation, related articles, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original article text was not changed.
Comments