top of page

[Copyright] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 7 (Wa) No. 10048 <Presiding Judge Matsukawa>

Oct 4
1 min read

Updated: Oct 9

Article information

Article type: Case note

Categories: Copyright

Issues: Moral rights

First published on this website: October 5, 2026

Case information: [Copyright] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 7 (Wa) No. 10048 <Presiding Judge Matsukawa>

Display and classification checked: October 5, 2026


[Copyright] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 7 (Wa) No. 10048 <Presiding Judge Matsukawa>

1. The defendants' unauthorized cropping and omission of the author's name infringed the plaintiff's right to maintain the integrity of the work and right of attribution.

⇒ The defendants argued that the image only appeared to have been cropped due to the website's layout specifications, but this argument was not accepted.

2. The article's content as a whole, incorporating inappropriate language intended to attract views, damaged the plaintiff's social reputation as a photographer and constituted exploitation of the work in a way that was prejudicial to the author's honor or reputation (Article 113(11) of the Copyright Act).

Original article:


Update history

Dated entries are added when the text is corrected or supplemented, or when classification, related links, or presentation is updated.

October 5, 2026: First published from the LinkedIn original, with article information, classification, source, language link, and consultation guide.

Consultation

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page