top of page

[Trademarks] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 9818 — “熱中対策応急キット” (Heatstroke countermeasure emergency kit) (Judge Takemiya)

Oct 9
1 min read

Updated: Oct 9


Article information

Article type: Case note

Category: Trademarks

Topics: Distinctiveness

First published on this site: 2026-10-10

Display/classification checked: 2026-10-10


[Trademarks] Osaka District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 9818 — “熱中対策応急キット” (Heatstroke countermeasure emergency kit) (Judge Takemiya)

*At the date of the registration decision, “熱中対策” was understood to mean “heatstroke countermeasures.”

→ No distinctiveness (contrary to Article 3(1)(iii) of the Trademark Act).

(Excerpt from the judgment, translated)

At the date of the registration decision, “熱中対策” was also generally understood to mean “heatstroke countermeasures.” “熱中対策応急キット” was generally recognized as meaning a set of articles used for heatstroke countermeasures or first aid, or goods containing such articles. [...]

When the registered mark “熱中対策応急キット” was used for such goods, it was generally recognized by traders or consumers as indicating their intended use.

Original article (2025-08-14):




Update history

This history records actual publication, display, and classification changes made on this site.

2026-10-10: First published the LinkedIn original on this site and set the classification, article information, and consultation link.

2026-10-10: Updated related-article links. The original article text was not changed.

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page