Topic guide: Damages and enforcement
Explore articles on damages, injunctions and proof of infringement. The relevant considerations differ across legal fields and cases; consult the individual articles and their sources.
[Trademarks] IP High Court, Reiwa 6 (Gyo-Ke) 10098, “Health and Productivity Management EXPO” (健康経営EXPO) (Presiding Judge Honda)
Falls under Trademark Act Article 3(1)(iii) → Refusal “Health and productivity management” (健康経営) is a dictionary-listed compound meaning “a management approach that maintains and improves the health of people working in a company and enhances organizational soundness.” (Translation of the quoted definition.)
[Trademarks] IP High Court, Reiwa 6 (Gyo-Ke) 10101, “SCANTECH” (Presiding Judge Masuda)
Invalidation not established (Trademark Act Article 4(1)(x), (xv)) Well-known status of the cited “SCANTEC” mark: Not established (1) Domestic market share
[Article / Unfair competition] Relationship between “confusion” and “business interests” under Unfair Competition Prevention Act Article 2(1)(i) (Hisayoshi Yokoyama, Patent, October 2023)
1. Interpreting “confusion in the broad sense” Item (i) includes both narrow confusion (mistaken belief in identical source) and broad confusion (mistaken belief in a relationship between sources). Since item (ii) was created, regulation of dilution/free riding without confusion should be left to item (ii), while confusion under item (i) should be assessed concretely and substantively.
![[Article / US patents] Extraterritorial application of patent law (Fumi Tastuno, Patent, November 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_791a5826d7f54b0dac25d5330d234e4e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_791a5826d7f54b0dac25d5330d234e4e~mv2.webp)
![[Article / US patents] Extraterritorial application of patent law (Fumi Tastuno, Patent, November 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_791a5826d7f54b0dac25d5330d234e4e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_791a5826d7f54b0dac25d5330d234e4e~mv2.webp)
[Article / US patents] Extraterritorial application of patent law (Fumi Tastuno, Patent, November 2023)
1. Direct infringement (35 U.S.C. § 271(a)) (1) System inventions (NTP) Even if some components (servers, etc.) are outside the United States, use is considered domestic if the system is “controlled and beneficially used” in the United States, with its benefits enjoyed there.
[Article / Chinese patents] Points to note when claiming priority in China—focusing on a Chinese Supreme Court judgment (Jun Lin, Chunfeng Hu, Patent, December 2023)
Chinese Supreme Court, (2019) 最高法行申 No. 12487 1. Case outline The application was rejected for lack of novelty (self-collision) based on earlier application 134.
![[Article / Copyright] Supreme Court, Reiwa 3 (Ju) 1112, “Music school case” (Yoshinobu Hisamura, Patent, February 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_fb6fd013666c410282dccb34fb1264ea~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_fb6fd013666c410282dccb34fb1264ea~mv2.webp)
![[Article / Copyright] Supreme Court, Reiwa 3 (Ju) 1112, “Music school case” (Yoshinobu Hisamura, Patent, February 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_fb6fd013666c410282dccb34fb1264ea~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_fb6fd013666c410282dccb34fb1264ea~mv2.webp)
[Article / Copyright] Supreme Court, Reiwa 3 (Ju) 1112, “Music school case” (Yoshinobu Hisamura, Patent, February 2024)
The Supreme Court did not regard students’ performances as being under the music school’s control, for these reasons: (1) Purpose: Students seek to “acquire and improve performance skills”; playing assigned pieces is merely a “means” to that end. (2) Autonomy: Students play of their own volition; teachers’ instruction merely “assists” them (it is not compulsion).
![[Article / Korean patents] Treatment of extraterritorial matters in Korea (ジョン ウォンギ, Patent, November 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_b4c273b17d3046918cff4ec63d4379a0~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_b4c273b17d3046918cff4ec63d4379a0~mv2.webp)
![[Article / Korean patents] Treatment of extraterritorial matters in Korea (ジョン ウォンギ, Patent, November 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_b4c273b17d3046918cff4ec63d4379a0~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_b4c273b17d3046918cff4ec63d4379a0~mv2.webp)
[Article / Korean patents] Treatment of extraterritorial matters in Korea (ジョン ウォンギ, Patent, November 2023)
Korean courts tend to interpret territoriality flexibly, assessing infringement primarily by whether acts of working the patent occur in Korea, regardless of the location of servers or assembly. 1. Servers located abroad (1) Seoul Central District Court, 2007, 2006 Gahap 73442
[IP Practice Online] “20 inventive-step issues, 3 min each” (Authors; supervisor: Hideki Takaishi)
[Summary; case discussions omitted] 1. Motivation to combine and design choice are independent. Weak correlation with problem-solving favors design choice. 2. Cited-invention eligibility: No comment.
![[Article / Unfair competition law] Remedies for Indications Misleading as to Quality, etc. (Masaru Adachi, Patent Supplement, October 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_9de2d7e124c141c38172f51612e99b59~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_332,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_9de2d7e124c141c38172f51612e99b59~mv2.webp)
![[Article / Unfair competition law] Remedies for Indications Misleading as to Quality, etc. (Masaru Adachi, Patent Supplement, October 2023)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_9de2d7e124c141c38172f51612e99b59~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_319,h_240,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_9de2d7e124c141c38172f51612e99b59~mv2.webp)
[Article / Unfair competition law] Remedies for Indications Misleading as to Quality, etc. (Masaru Adachi, Patent Supplement, October 2023)
Read the Japanese version / 日本語版を読む [Article / Unfair competition law] Remedies for Indications Misleading as to Quality, etc.—Including a Comparison with Similar Provisions in the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the Antimonopoly Act (足立勝, Patent Supplement, October 2023) 1. Comparison with the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations and the Antimonopoly Act (1) Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading R