top of page

[U.S.] December 2012 <CAFC> Santarus v. Par Pharmaceutical

1 day ago
1 min read

Updated: 6 hours ago


Article information

Article type: Case note

Category: United States

Topics: Support requirement

First published on this website: 2026-11-01

Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026


Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-09-14 (Japan time). Full English translation.

[U.S.] December 2012 <CAFC> 694 F.3d 1344, Santarus v. Par Pharmaceutical

The negative expression “the gastric medication does not contain sucralfate” satisfied the written-description requirement.

The reason was explained in the specification.

⇒ The specification stated that using sucralfate in a gastric medication could cause complications damaging the gastric mucosa.



Update history

The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.

November 1, 2026: First published on this website.

November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page