[U.S.] Provisur Tech v. Weber (October 2, 2024), CAFC
Updated: 6 hours ago
Article information
Article type: Case note
Category: United States
Topics: —
First published on this website: 2026-11-01
Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026
Originally published on Ameblo: 2025-06-29 (Japan time). Full English translation.
[U.S.] Provisur Tech v. Weber (October 2, 2024), CAFC
Where changing an accused product's settings would bring it within the invention's technical scope, a theoretical possibility alone does not establish infringement; it must actually be “readily configurable.”
=Fantasy Sports Props. v. http://Sportsline.com, 287 F.3d 1108 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
⇒ The accused product was sold in “retract-to-fill” mode, and customers' access to the settings screen needed to enable claim 14's function (“advance-to-fill”) was restricted.
⇒ The district court judgment finding infringement was reversed.
Update history
The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.
November 1, 2026: First published on this website.
November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.
Comments