Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 70129
[Box-shaped vessel] (Presiding Judge Sugiura) *The defendant denies involvement with the products at issue. ⇒ No "obligation to clarify the specific manner."
[Article / Patents] Terms to avoid in specifications from a translator’s perspective—particularly “jisha,” “jisōchi” and “jisharyō” (Hajime Kuramasu, Patent, March 2025)
1. The problem with “jisha” (one’s own company) and “tasha” (other companies) Problem: They are often rendered in English as grammatically incorrect expressions such as “its own company” or “an own company” (“own” needs a possessive pronoun). Suggested improvement: Use “a company” at the first mention and “the company” thereafter. Consider “in-house” for an internal nuance. Make “tasha” specific as “another company” or “competitor.”
Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 70460
[Widening structure for a shield tunnel] (Presiding Judge Nakajima) *Claim requirements not satisfied (the doctrine of equivalents also not established).
IP High Court, Case No. 2025 (Gyo-ke) 10056
[Women's clothing] (Presiding Judge Moritomi) *Inventive step recognized.
Osaka District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 7055
[Taxi dispatch management system] (Presiding Judge Matsuami) *Claim requirements not satisfied (the doctrine of equivalents also not established). "Taxi (information)" in claim element C means individual vehicles (information about them).
Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 70064
[Aerosol for mosquito control] (Presiding Judge Takahashi) *Violation of the clarity requirement. "Adherent particles" means chemical-agent particles formed by spraying aerosol concentrate into the treatment space, which adhere to floor surfaces, walls, etc., remain adhered as time passes, and exterminate or control mosquitoes resting on exposed portions.
Tokyo District Court, Case No. 2023 (Wa) 70402
[Siphonic rain gutter system] (Presiding Judge Nakajima) *Inventive step recognized. The inventions in Exhibits Otsu A25 and Otsu A26 lack motivation for combination because their technical approaches are opposites (the former generates turbulence; the latter prevents it).
[IP Practice Online] Introduction of important patent judgments newly included in "Patent Case Law Encyclopedia, 4th edition" (Chizai Juku)
(Hideki Takaishi, Nakamura & Partners) [Some case introductions omitted] 1. Central message of the video
[IP Practice Online] Transforming corporate IP with AI agents — From business assistant to strategic partner (Kosuke Kuriyama)
[Summary translation to fit the character limit] IP departments should redesign operations and organization around AI that obtains materials, plans and executes multiple processes. The aim is to assign routine filing, prosecution and searches to AI, freeing humans for case prioritization, claim design, business alignment and IP strategy.
IP High Court, Case No. 2025 (Ne) 10048
[System for providing an integrated homepage service] (Presiding Judge Nakadaira) *Claim requirements not satisfied (same as the first-instance judgment).