[Trademark] IP High Court, 2020 (Ne) 10017 <Honda> — First Cumulative Application of Paragraphs 2 and 3 in a Trademark Case
Updated: 6 hours ago
Article information
Article type: Case note
Category: Trademarks
Topics: Abuse of rights
First published on this website: 2026-11-01
Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026
Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-08-27 (Japan time). Full English translation.
[Trademark] IP High Court, 2020 (Ne) 10017 <Honda>
One of three parties that had long used the “Morihan” indication obtained a trademark registration for “Morihan.”
⇒ Enforcing rights against “Morihan” constitutes an abuse of rights, but enforcing them against “Morihan Sohonpo” does not.
For the first time in a trademark case, cumulative application of paragraphs 2 and 3 was permitted.—“Nonidentity of markets”
Update history
The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.
November 1, 2026: First published on this website.
November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.
Comments