top of page

[Trademark] IP High Court, 2020 (Ne) 10017 <Honda> — First Cumulative Application of Paragraphs 2 and 3 in a Trademark Case

1 day ago
1 min read

Updated: 6 hours ago


Article information

Article type: Case note

Category: Trademarks

Topics: Abuse of rights

First published on this website: 2026-11-01

Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026


Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-08-27 (Japan time). Full English translation.

[Trademark] IP High Court, 2020 (Ne) 10017 <Honda>

One of three parties that had long used the “Morihan” indication obtained a trademark registration for “Morihan.”

⇒ Enforcing rights against “Morihan” constitutes an abuse of rights, but enforcing them against “Morihan Sohonpo” does not.

For the first time in a trademark case, cumulative application of paragraphs 2 and 3 was permitted.—“Nonidentity of markets”



Update history

The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.

November 1, 2026: First published on this website.

November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page