top of page

2023 (Gyo-Ke) 10034 [Method of Manufacturing a Raised-Fiber Sheet] <Hibiku Shimizu>

3 days ago
1 min read

Updated: 2 days ago


Article information

Article type: Case note

Category: Patents

Topics: Creators and inventors, Joint ownership

First published on this website: 2026-11-01

Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026


Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-10-17 (Japan time). Full English translation.

2023 (Gyo-Ke) 10034 [Method of Manufacturing a Raised-Fiber Sheet] <Hibiku Shimizu>

*Usurped application established (JPO decision set aside)

The true inventor's statement: pile length 2–3 mm

Claim 4 specifies 3–10 mm, so the statements are consistent.

Even if the usurping applicant devised various refinements to the dyeing process, none was included in the claims.

⇒ Could adding “the configuration devised by the usurping applicant” through correction have complicated the issue?

*Since patentability existed even without “the configuration devised by the usurping applicant,” perhaps this would merely become a violation of the joint-application requirement. If patentability were recognized only after adding that configuration through correction, the invention might have been solely that of the inventor named in the publication. A judgment offering lessons on points to consider when filing alone for an invention involving others!!



Update history

The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.

November 1, 2026: First published on this website.

November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.

Comments


Featured Posts

Recent Posts

Archive
Search by Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page