![[Article / Unfair Competition Prevention Act, Article 2(1)(i)] Protection of product packaging consisting of weakly distinctive elements — Suntory Black Oolong Tea case (Yukari Hira, Intellectual P...](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_559fae811b6a4f3ea8f2addcd334b65c~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1329,h_1000,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_559fae811b6a4f3ea8f2addcd334b65c~mv2.png)
![[Article / Unfair Competition Prevention Act, Article 2(1)(i)] Protection of product packaging consisting of weakly distinctive elements — Suntory Black Oolong Tea case (Yukari Hira, Intellectual P...](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_559fae811b6a4f3ea8f2addcd334b65c~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1276,h_960,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_559fae811b6a4f3ea8f2addcd334b65c~mv2.png)
[Article / Unfair Competition Prevention Act, Article 2(1)(i)] Protection of product packaging consisting of weakly distinctive elements — Suntory Black Oolong Tea case (Yukari Hira, Intellectual P...
Read the Japanese version / 日本語版を読む Article information Article type: Publication review Categories: Unfair competition law Topics: Indications of goods or business, Confusion First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17 [Article / Unfair Competition Prevention Act, Article 2(1)(i)] Protection of product packaging consisting of weakly distinctive elements — Suntory Black Oolong Tea case (Yukari Hira, Intellectual Property Law and
![[Trademarks] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 16062 — “仙修” (Judge Shibata)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_35c052da82c64373a995bf0276ac29f8~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1225,h_922,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_35c052da82c64373a995bf0276ac29f8~mv2.png)
![[Trademarks] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 16062 — “仙修” (Judge Shibata)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_35c052da82c64373a995bf0276ac29f8~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1225,h_922,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_35c052da82c64373a995bf0276ac29f8~mv2.png)
[Trademarks] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 16062 — “仙修” (Judge Shibata)
Read the Japanese version / 日本語版を読む Article information Article type: Case note Categories: Trademarks Topics: Similarity of trademarks, Trademark infringement First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17 Case information: Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 16062 [Trademarks] Tokyo District Court, Reiwa 4 (Wa) No. 16062 — “仙修” (Judge Shibata) Registered mark: 仙脩 ① 仙修: similar ② 仙修六神丸: similar ③ 御所 (boxed separately) 仙修: similar ④ 御所仙修: dissimilar ①
![[Unfair competition] IP High Court, Heisei 31 (Ne) No. 10002 (Judge Otaka)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_0fcdf3a465b34bb0a8e26e99039920d0~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1024,h_770,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_0fcdf3a465b34bb0a8e26e99039920d0~mv2.png)
![[Unfair competition] IP High Court, Heisei 31 (Ne) No. 10002 (Judge Otaka)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_0fcdf3a465b34bb0a8e26e99039920d0~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1024,h_770,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_0fcdf3a465b34bb0a8e26e99039920d0~mv2.png)
[Unfair competition] IP High Court, Heisei 31 (Ne) No. 10002 (Judge Otaka)
Read the Japanese version / 日本語版を読む Article information Article type: Case note Categories: Unfair competition law Topics: Indications of goods or business, Confusion First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17 Case information: Heisei 31 (Ne) No. 10002 [Unfair competition] IP High Court, Heisei 31 (Ne) No. 10002 (Judge Otaka) A violation of Article 2(1)(i) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act was found for products whose cus
Copyright: Including tweets in a book held to be lawful quotation under Copyright Act Article 32(1) — #KuToo case (Takuto Hirasawa, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 66, 2022)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Quotation, Moral rights, Defamation First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 Case information: Tokyo District Court, 2020 (Wa) No. 19351 [Article / Copyright] Including tweets in a book held to be lawful quotation under Copyright Act Article 32(1) — #KuToo case (Takuto Hirasawa, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 66, 202
![[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1024,h_770,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png)
![[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1024,h_770,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_3452649c3ebe4edabbaa08813737623a~mv2.png)
[Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Copyrightability, Applied art First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 [Article] Copyrightability of two-dimensional patterns — Appeal in the Futon Pattern case (李遠杰, Intellectual Property Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 69, 2024) These three cases all denied copyrightability of utilitarian articles bearing two-dimensional patterns: • Futo
![[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1188,h_894,fp_0.50_0.50,q_35,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png)
![[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_1188,h_894,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/324a18_216cc5affebd44adbb8767ef38caa485~mv2.png)
[Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Publication review Category: Copyright Topics: Copyrightability, Applied art First published on this website: 2026-10-16 Display and classification checked: October 17, 2026 [Article / Copyright] Copyrightability denied for makeup, hairstyling, and the selection and coordination of clothing and accessories in a fashion show, Parts 1–2 (橋谷俊, Vol. 47, 2015) IP High Court, August 28, 2014 (appeal); Tokyo District Court, July 19, 2013 Both c
Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 5 (Designs)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Reports and activities Category: Designs Topics: Similarity of designs, Examination and appeal practice First published on this site: 2026-10-11 Display/classification checked: 2026-10-11 Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 5 (Designs) [Similarity of designs: the person whose perspective governs] Identifying the relevant person takes account of the nature, purpose and manner of use of the article embodying the
Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 4 (Electrical 1)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Reports and activities Category: Patents Topics: Patent eligibility, Examination and appeal practice First published on this site: 2026-10-11 Display/classification checked: 2026-10-11 Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 4 (Electrical 1) [Eligibility as an invention: human mental activities and artificial arrangements] Whether something “as a whole” constitutes a creation of technical ideas utilizing the laws o
Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Case 3 (Chemistry 2)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Reports and activities Category: Patents Topics: Added matter, Enablement, Support requirement, Examination and appeal practice First published on this site: 2026-10-11 Display/classification checked: 2026-10-11 Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Case 3 (Chemistry 2) [Relationship between requirements for correction of medical-use inventions, particularly new matter, and the enablement and support requirements for t
Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 6 (Trademarks)
日本語版 Article information Article type: Reports and activities Category: Trademarks Topics: Similarity of trademarks, Distinctiveness, Examination and appeal practice First published on this site: 2026-10-11 Display/classification checked: 2026-10-11 Trial and Appeal Practitioners Study Group Report 2024 — Theme 6 (Trademarks) [Similarity of composite marks] <Marks formed by adding other characters, etc., to an already registered mark> • Whether the registered-mark portion is
