top of page

[Copyright] Osaka District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 5501

23 時間前
読了時間: 1分

更新日:3 時間前

Article information

Categories: Copyright

Topics: Vicarious liability / Damages

Published on this website: 2026-09-29

[Copyright] Osaka District Court, Case No. 2024 (Wa) 5501

(Presiding Judge Matsuami)

*Employer liability under Article 715(1) of the Civil Code recognized!!

The manager was to perform managerial duties in accordance with various manuals prescribed by the defendant; whenever an unclear or uncertain matter arose, the manager was required to contact and consult the defendant; and prior written consent from the defendant was required for posting on sites using social media, etc.

⇒ The manager's discretion was very narrow, and managerial duties were performed under the defendant's de facto direction and supervision. The defendant qualifies as "a person who employs another person for a business."

The act of the manager or an employee posting the illustration under the mistaken belief that it was so-called free material constitutes a tort of negligent copyright infringement (rights of reproduction and public transmission).

(Quoted wording is translated.)


Intellectual property enquiries

 
 
 
Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page