[U.S./Trademark] Supreme Court No. 12-761, POM v. COCA-COLA (June 12, 2014)
更新日：3 日前
Article information
Article type: Case note
Category: United States, Trademarks
Topics: —
First published on this website: 2026-11-01
Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026
Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-07-08 (Japan time). Full English translation.
[U.S./Trademark] Supreme Court No. 12-761, POM v. COCA-COLA (June 12, 2014)
A false-advertising action under the Lanham Act is not barred by the FDCA (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) or the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Act). (Their purposes differ.)
The FDCA can preclude state law, but cannot preclude federal law.
Translator’s notes (editorial)
The source calls FDA the “U.S. Food and Drug Administration Act.” This anomalous expansion is translated literally, not silently corrected.
Update history
The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.
November 1, 2026: First published on this website.
November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.
