[U.S.] December 2012 <CAFC> Santarus v. Par Pharmaceutical
更新日:3 日前
Article information
Article type: Case note
Category: United States
Topics: Support requirement
First published on this website: 2026-11-01
Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026
Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-09-14 (Japan time). Full English translation.
[U.S.] December 2012 <CAFC> 694 F.3d 1344, Santarus v. Par Pharmaceutical
The negative expression “the gastric medication does not contain sucralfate” satisfied the written-description requirement.
The reason was explained in the specification.
⇒ The specification stated that using sucralfate in a gastric medication could cause complications damaging the gastric mucosa.
Update history
The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.
November 1, 2026: First published on this website.
November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.