top of page

IP High Court, 2023 (Gyo-Ke) 10055 — Laser Processing Apparatus (Miyasaka)

2 日前
読了時間: 1分

更新日:1 日前


Article information

Article type: Case note

Categories: Patents

Topics: Inventive step, Motivation and teaching away

First published on this website: 2026-10-16

Display and classification checked: 2026-10-17

Case information: 2023 (Gyo-Ke) 10055


IP High Court, 2023 (Gyo-Ke) 10055 — Laser Processing Apparatus (Miyasaka)

“Exhibit Ko 1 has no modified region in the thickness direction of the substrate. Accordingly, there is no need to ascertain the position or size of a modified region in the substrate’s thickness direction, and a person skilled in the art who encounters Exhibit Ko 1 has no … motivation to adopt Feature G relating to Difference 2.”

⇒ Inventive step: affirmed.

* If the “modified region” of the invention at issue is a groundbreaking technical concept absent from the prior art, this is a strong patent. (If a “modified region” had also existed in the prior art, using that prior art as the principal reference might have led to a different conclusion, but this would depend on the other features.)

092782_hanrei.pdf

Originally published: 2025-03-08




Update history

This history records actual publication, display, and classification changes made on this website.

2026-10-16: The AMEBLO source was first published on this website.

2026-10-17: Added classification, topic tags, article information, translation navigation, related articles, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original article text was not changed.

 
 
 
Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page