[Trademark] Osaka District Court, 2020 (Wa) 7918 <Takemiya>
更新日：2 日前
Article information
Article type: Case note
Category: Trademarks
Topics: —
First published on this website: 2026-11-01
Display and classification checked: November 2, 2026
Originally published on Ameblo: 2024-08-03 (Japan time). Full English translation.
[Trademark] Osaka District Court, 2020 (Wa) 7918 <Takemiya>
Estoppel precludes infringement claims against goods identical or similar to robots excluded during prosecution in response to a notice of reasons for refusal under Article 3(1)(iii).
In the manner of use at issue, consumers do not understand the defendant's mark as meaning “robot” or “store.”
⇒ Article 26(1)(ii) does not apply.
Update history
The first-published date remains unchanged. Display maintenance, classification changes, related-article updates, and text corrections are recorded separately.
November 1, 2026: First published on this website.
November 2, 2026: Added article information, classification, topics, language navigation, related articles where the same case was confirmed, consultation guidance, and SEO. The original text and first-published date were preserved.
